Stackscene

The view from my reading pile.

Review: Kiki Magazine January 25, 2010

Filed under: book review — stackscene @ 11:20 am
Tags: , , , ,

Wandering through the exhibit hall at ALA can be incredibly overwhelming. People everywhere, booths crammed full of exciting looking books and posters, and yet the publishers of Kiki still managed to stand out with their mannequin clothed in a giant pink tutu and green jacket. After chatting with the editor in chief of the magazine, Jamie Bryant, I may have asked her to be my mom, it’s a little hazy at that point. What I was hearing about this magazine was kind of making me dizzy, and we can file this under: WHY DIDN’T THIS EXIST WHEN I WAS A KID?

Kiki is a fashion magazine for young girls (I’d say probably as young as 7 would enjoy it, up to around the 13 year-old range) that completely breaks the mold and has a blast doing it. There are no ads in the mag, no articles about dating or boys (which ok, some people feel is a detriment, but I agree with the editors that girls are getting that stuff thrown at them so early and from so many sources that I don’t think they’re going to miss it here), and the models are real girls, not older models made to look young. One of the cover models even has *gasp* braces! I picked up two issues to look through, and completely fell in love with Kiki’s fun, intelligent voice. The mag doesn’t talk down to its readers, and the fashion is a way to talk about a variety of topics like science, business, interesting careers, and more.

I especially loved that in one of the issues I looked at, there was a spread on some pretty extreme couture designers like Alexander McQueen, and then at the end was a page with a girl wearing some outfits put together from McQueen’s line for Target. I thought it was really cool to see the wild high fashion, and then have the magazine say “ok, clearly that is not what you, a young girl, are probably going to wear to school. Here are some things that are actually reasonable for you to wear, that just about anyone can probably find without living in a big city, and without making your parents go broke. Also, you do not have to look like a fashion model to wear this.” So very yes.

Every issue has a theme (the two issues I have are the “Extreme” issue and a History of 20th century fashion issue) with fashion that explores that theme and articles taking the theme into areas I didn’t expect. In the Extreme issue there’s an article on astronaut Sunita Williams, after which readers are encouraged to design their own version of the space suit. The magazine has DIY projects and recipes, and really just feels like something a lot of girls can get into.

I handed one of the issues off to two sisters (13 and 10) to see what they thought, and both girls were pretty enthusiastic about it. They liked the projects and thought they looked like stuff they could probably manage, and said that the writing was interesting. I already said that I’m personally in love with the mission of the magazine and the aesthetic they’ve chosen, and I’d love to see this in magazine racks in public and school libraries, giving girls an alternative to Seventeen and other magazines like it.

 

Book Review: Little Blog on the Prairie, by Cathleen Davitt Bell January 20, 2010

Filed under: book review — stackscene @ 1:52 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

This past weekend was the American Library Association’s Annual Midwinter Conference, held this time around in Boston. Since it was local for me, I attended, and had a pretty fantastic time. I have some things to post about from the conference, but today you’re getting a book review, because one of the things about ALA is that publishers give you books. Lots of them. Um, kind of a ridiculous amount, actually. So consider this Standard Disclaimer 1 (am I weird that I am totally considering writing up my standard disclaimers and just linking to them as needed?), which is that the publisher provided this advanced copy free of charge for review. Also this is an uncorrected proof, so I’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt on the typos.

Genevieve Welsh is convinced her summer has been ruined. The 14 year-old is being forced to go on a “Frontier Camp” vacation with her family, where they and several other families will spend the summer pretending to be in the year 1890, with no technology, no swimming pool, and no indoor plumbing. Gen manages to smuggle in a cell phone, and her texts to her friends back home are used as a blog, which turns the girl into a celebrity.

I have to admit, after the first couple of chapters I almost put this book down. I was a fan of the “Little House” books as a kid, but let’s face it: going back to that time would be very uncomfortable for more than just physical reasons. Reading the set up in the book, and the first few days at Frontier Camp just made me annoyed thinking about the realities of life in the 1890s for minorities and women. I did pick the book back up after a day or two, and I’m glad I did.

There’s really a lot going on here about parents and children, and about the choices that parents try to make for their children. Ron and Betsy, the couple that runs the camp, have raised their daughter almost entirely as though it really were 1890. Sure, there are communities that do this for various reasons, but a key word there is “community”. Ron and Betsy’s daughter Nora has grown up almost entirely isolated with her parents, except during the summer when campers come to the camp, hate it all summer, and then claim to be “transformed” at the end of the experience. At the end of the book Nora is chance to leave the frontier behind, and her parents are horrified that she might choose the modern world, when they’ve worked so hard to show her something better. The fact that they did not give her a choice, and have only let her tangentially experience modernity doesn’t seem to occur to her parents, and I thought it was a really interesting parallel with Gen’s conflicts with her own parents. Gen of course has been raised entirely in the modern world, but really wasn’t given a choice about going to the camp for the summer. Gen and her brother do find things they love about this life, and when Gen is offered fame and a book deal, she turns it down rather than hurt the people at the camp. This could have been an incredibly cheesy ending, or felt false, but the perspective from Gen’s narration does ring true with her motivations. The major difference between Gen and Nora is that Gen has been given choices, and Nora has been forced into something she never agreed to.

I said earlier that I the idea of the camp itself annoyed me, and I should also say that I think deals with most of these issues in a fairly satisfying way. A few of the women nearly lead a feminist uprising (which would have been AWESOME), and when there’s a medical crisis and the illusion of 1890 is broken, Ron is honest with the kids about how things would have gone differently if it were actually 1890.

I totally want to do a book club discussion of this someday, to talk about the good and bad aspects of life on the frontier as the characters are experiencing it, finding balance in life (is it ok that Ron and Betsy occasionally take breaks from 1890, even though they so desperately wanted to leave the modern world?), the decisions parents try to make for their kids and the ways that can go wrong, and some of the other issues the book raised.

Overall I would absolutely recommend this to teenage girls and boys, especially if they read the Little House books as younger kids.